The threatened government shut-down we all feared to occur at nine o clock tonight has been averted. KTLA interrupted the boy Lex Luther running in terror through a corn field to bring us an address from the President of the United State. Democrats and Republicans came to an agreement tonight to compromize. The President had to make sacrifices, but now government workers and our troops in uniform in particular, will get paid. Details of the agreement are still not forthcoming but apparently the budget is scheduled for long enough for congress to take one of its many, many vacations - this one two weeks - to return to this budget problem upon their return. The President generally seems happy about this compromise. This breakthrough constitutes a major defeat for the Tea Party, who was counting a shut down to cause general chaos in government and to sabotage this already weak economy. We can now all rest knowing metaphorically that we will live to fight another day.
The following news dispatch hot off the Google press flagged my attention because of it’s assenine nature, so in Rush Limbaugh fashion I am now going to repeat each line point by point. Later on we are going to have some plum remarks by an actual Tea Party afficianado. I decided to go with the alias of "Minister X" because people on the Right are forever quoting "Minister Faracon" on his various statements. (I believe the term is a veiled allusion to the old Black Panther Party that used to address its appointed officers as "Minister") Anyhow, I got to thinking how unfair it was and decided that people on the right deserved also to have the "honor" of being elevated to the status as "Minister". I almost didn't run this tonight but due to a glitch in my computer shutting down, when I came back from buying cigarettes the screen was still up and so I canceled and got to work. The following is vis Fox News.
As the deadline for a government slowdown approaches, liberals are leading the charge to blame the budget impasse on the Tea Party movement. This is because the Democrats last night agreed to a seventy billion dollar budget cut but the tea party crowd said no, and thus quite rightly the tea party is responsible for the shut-down. They after all are the ones with the signs “Shut It Down” and the like.
This progressive political strategy serves a two-fold objective. First, by assigning responsibility for the failing budget negotiations on the Tea Party, liberals hope to avoid any culpability in the morass. But “Hope” has nothing to do with it. The liberals and Obama tried to avert it with every manner of compromise. Second, if there is a government slowdown, they want any public hardships blamed on anyone but themselves. Not just “anyone” but the Tea Party themselves.
After years of trying to label the Tea Party movement as extremist, liberals now hope that shuttered museums, national park closures and concerns about grandma not getting her Social Security check next month, will turn public opinion against the social movement responsible for ending liberals’ virtual monopoly on political power in Washington. That’s true. A government shut down will cause chaos, and the tea party will do anything to sabotage this faltering economy to improve Republican chances next year.
With the potential loss of the Senate and executive branch next year, liberals are looking for the political equivalent of kryptonite to weaken the relative superpower of the Tea Party movement. The tea party controls one half or one half of one half of one third of governmental power. It’s truly a case of the tail wagging the dog. Republicans themselves are divided about the Tea Party. And Republicans comprise only one half the house, which comprises only one half of the legislature, etcetra, etcetra.
Given the high stakes of a government slowdown and an opportunity to exploit the crisis for political gain, it was not shocking to hear about the liberal’s strategy to blame the Tea Party coming straight from the mouth of Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. If car dealer A rips you off and you now turn to car dealer B, I suppose it can be said that “B” profited from how badly car dealer A screwed up.
In a recent conference call with Senate colleagues in which he unknowingly laid out the strategy to reporters who were also on the call, Schumer instructed that the spin was to blame the Tea Party movement for conservative Sen.s sticking to legislation already passed in the House of Representatives that cut a mere $61 billion in spending. “I always use the word ‘extreme,’” he said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.” “Extreme” seems to me to be the best word for it.
Schumer followed his marching orders as dutifully as Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. Durbin, commenting about House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said, “And he has to tell his Tea Party ‘roughriders’ to put their horses in the barn. Save this argument for another day.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., can’t open his mouth these days without slamming the Tea Party movement. The irony, of course, is that it’s not the Tea Party’s fault that in April 2011 Congress is sill haggling over the budget due in September 2010. The accountability for not having a budget resides fully with President Obama and his allies on Capitol Hill, who controlled the legislative agenda with a vast majority until this past January. I don’t understand that myself. Only that congress last year was very productive with a lot of other vital legislation. Like Obamacare, liberals could have used their political advantage to ram a budget through Congress and Obama could have signed it.
But the budget was not a priority. Instead, Obama and his progressive congressional allies spent their political capital and time having the government take over our nation’s health care system and trying to legislate fossil fuels out of existence through a “cap-and-trade” scheme. A budget just didn’t fit into this busy progressive agenda. “Cap and trade” sucks. Taxes on energy are the last thing we need in this recession.
Liberals’ failure to act left it up to the new congressional leadership. The conservative House passed a budget in February, but the Senate — still controlled by liberals — has yet to pass anything similar. The senate is controlled by Democrats. I would not call them all liberals.
Words can lie, but numbers don’t. In context, cutting $61 billion — or the $100 billion wanted by the Tea Party — from a federal budget expected to spend $3.8 trillion is far from extreme. They aren’t cutting waste in medicare or the military or funding for any of our three wars. They aren’t closing tax loopholes. They are cutting the small percentage of discressionary federal spending that helps the least fortunate among us. The sheer fact that liberals are threatening a government slowdown over a mere 1.6 percent cut in the total budget just reeks of political shenanigans. No liberals are “threatening” a government shut down. Again it is the tea party that is clamoring for that.
As opposed to the last government slowdown, liberals are misplaying their hand. Clinton-era slowdowns hurt conservatives, and that’s what the liberals expect this time. Or in the words of Dr. Phil, “The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior”. What they are not considering is that debt was not a concern back then. This bit of detail is immitareal to the general belief it will hurt the tea party. Fear of the exploding national deficit — a key Tea Party rallying point — is on virtually everyone’s mind these days. Moreover, progressive demonization of the Tea Party movement is not working. It didn’t work when they tried to marginalize and discredit the movement by calling its members racists and it’s not working now as they try to blame the Tea Party movement for the lack of a budget deal. The racism of the tea party is there on the public record for all to hear, and this debacle will also be evident for all to see.
More problematic for Obama and company is that more Americans are siding with the Tea Party, and this rise seems to correlate with increasing frustration over Congress.
According to polling conducted by Rasmussen Reports:
• 49 percent of voters believe the Tea Party movement is having a positive effect on the nation; I don’t believe that number for a second. • 48 percent of likely U.S. voters say that their opinions on major issues match the average Tea Party member more than average member of Congress; and • 45 percent think Tea Party members understand the problems facing America better than the average member of Congress. The media covers any rally of the tea party no matter how small but when massive demonstrations occur in support of labor unions or against the Wars we are in, the media ignores that.
Tea Party activism is the driving force demanding accountability from the government that serves the people. Liberal efforts to play political word games and smear tactics is not a substitute for an effective political strategy to meet the challenges facing Americans. The clock is indeed ticking, and time is running out for politicians playing the same old games. Dylan once said, “Don’t speak too soon for the wheel’s still in spin and there’s no telling who that it’s naming”. I predict that a year from now the Tea Party will be just a bad memory as Republicans scamper to nominate someone like Mitt Romney who is not universally known as a political extremist. The whole political strategy, formulated by the Koch brothers, is based on sound bites and talking points to be repeated endlessly without question. One tea party afficianado made the following remarks about President Obama just this morning, as follows.
The following are actual remarks. Then we started talking about current events. Minister X said that Obama was a socialist and hung out with Bill Ayres, Jeremiah Wright, and now a new name is added to the list. Obama is best friends with Louis Faracon and consults with him on making policy. Also Obama “Has made the economy worse than it already war”. And “The President’s policies have not added one single job”. Minister X says “There Is No Recovery”. Also the run up in gasoline prices is all Obama’s fault because the President is against drilling in