Today President Obama scheduled his speech a half hour early before the evening prime time shows commenced in the majority of the country. It was a well written speech with lots of appropiate flowery rhetoric at the end to get the patriotic spirit going. Some may argue it's a low blow to praise the service men for an action you personally order. The only thing about the speech was that there were times where the President hesitated, as if he were not sure what he was saying was true. If I picked up on that you can bet John Mc Cain did. Our President did a pretty good job of summarizing how we got to where we are now. He spoke of the sanctions that were imposed and the UN resolution, giving Kadaffy a choice, and of the iminent danger to the city of Bengazy, a city of some 700 thousand. He spoke of how the US initially took the lead but how we plan to turn the campaign over to our allies in a few days. He spoke of how effectively we have already halted Kadaffy's progress. What he neglected to say was that in the past two days the rebels have re-taken city after city along the coast, and now are prepared to do battle in Kadaffy's home town. Of course certain nay-sayers like John Mc Cain and Newt Gingrinch will never be satisfied. Either the President waited too long, or else he acted too soon. Many accuse the President of being unclear or unfocused. I think the President made himself quite clear tonight. Many nattering nebobs of negativism in the media keep on saying how "something unforeseen might come up to spoil the mission". What these talking heads never consider is not "what if it doesn't work?" but rather, "What if it does?" The prospect of a positive outcome doesn't seem to enter the minds of these people. Were they in charge at the time of the Civil War they would have surrendered after the battle of Bull Run. I think it's important also to not compare this mission to- - for instance- - sending the military in to stop genocide on the Ivery Coast. Certain tasks are inherently more "doable" than other tasks. But after this mission is accomplished, then maybe we can think about Sudan or the Ivery Coast. The key thing to remember is that this campaign is a UN Security Council mandate, and had we failed to act, and that would have reflected badly on the United States. He also spoke of the higher ideals of the United States.
In Japan those nuclear reactors are inching closer and closer to a melt-down. All the time they are discovering increased radiation in far-flung places of the world. We can pray for those people. Thom Hartman is wrong. The reason why they call them "fall-out" shelters is because the radioactive isotopes "fall out" of the sky and land on the populace. But it is of course true that food toxins tend to concentrate in the biological food chain and the higher up the chain goes the more deadly the toxin. I told people at last Friday's residents council meeting I wish they would bring back spinach, and Marcie seconded my notion. I guess they are considering any further remediation of the reactor as a "suicide mission" and few will volunteer fore it. I don't see why they haven't developed more advanced radio controlled robotics to handle the problem. A big criticism of the second Star Trek movie was that Spock was sent in to a radioactive area tantamount to a death sentence. I'm going to research this story more thoroughly before my next posting. I'm sure you people probably already know a lot more in the way of updates than I do at this time.
I went to bed actually before nine, which was a mistake. I had this dream and it’s one of these cases where I am beginning to theorize an “other life” that I keep dreaming about, like an alternate existence. I seem to have had a lot of dreams about this alternate existence lately. One a few weeks ago was about playing an old reel to reel tape that was made in the year 2000, which was quite a long time ago for this person. It was made in November when there was a dry
Let's get in a short Beatle song quiz here. Of the following list of songs, list the two that were not released in the sixties, under another title, obviously. Scrambled Eggs, That Means A Lot, If You've Got Troubles, That's A Nice Hat, Auntie Gin's Song, One Way Ticket, Won't Be There With You, This Bird Has Flown, Granny Smith, Laxton's Superb, Mark I.
I hope that Dr. Levy was able to relate to that 3 ½ page treaties on “God” I sent him. He appeared to be praising me in class but like I say never made any reference to the letter. Perhaps I should go through the letter and see what parts of it haven’t yet been posted yet to Blogger.com. Like Obama's case for war, I make many appeals to established precedent. Of course the whole concept of the deity is a very personal one for people and each person sees God in his own way. Some are “free will” deists, who believe God leaves it entirely up to man’s ingenuity to solve his own problems. Some people are pantheists, who see every animal as a god. Others see nature as a whole as “God”. Yung and other psychologists see “God” as the “collective unconscious”. At one time I believe I made the case for collective Yung-ism, which says that perhaps the whole “mind” that did create the Universe is our own collective unconscious, so that if we have a problem with His or Its will, we have only to blame ourselves. Finally we come to what might be called the Eastern view which Gnostics also incorporate into their theology. This is the belief that some higher aspect of our own souls that has up till now been suppressed, has some pipeline to the “God” nature, and in this way we can achieve a form of Divinity- or at least some form of sinlessness or cosmic harmony with Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment