The Speck in Your Brother's Eye

Jesus did teach on judging. But he never said to give sin a pass. This is the example people quote about judging. "Do not take the speck out of your brothers eye when there is a plank in your own, but first remove the plank from your own eye then you can see clearly to take the speck out of your brothers". Clearly Jesus is teaching that your brother would be better off without the speck of sawdust in his eye. The question is to how about getting it out. But a lot of people tar brush the Wall Street prosters while giving their own side a pass. Shooting congressmen, blowing up government building,, murdering abortion doctors, picketing funerals of gay vetterans- - is all conduct they give themselves a pass on. One word I find particularly offensive coming from their side is the word "rebellion". Jesus of KFI called a woman who wanted to quit going to church "rebellious and petulant". Now Pat Robertson is calling the Wall Street protesters as "guilty of rebellion". I wish he would explain that one to me. Did we all elect a bank president or a C E O as President in 2008 or did we elect President Obama? So who is really guilty of "rebellion" here, if anybody is. Did Jesus of Nazareth teach one time that high taxes were somehow "Stealing from the rich?" I missed that verse. Now we are told that the Declaration of Independance and the like wouldn't be possible without the people that wrote it getting their ideas from the Bible. Romans 13 says we are to honor rulers (such as King George III) because his authority was given to him by God. Jesus said to pay your taxes. Verily, Jesus said "to go the extra mile". Jesus said to pray for the success of "those who persecute you" assuming President Obama is in this camp. I'm not anti Wall Street. How many times have I urged in my postings to go out and invest in stocks lately? In fact I am against eliminating the capital gains tax. Why? Because it's an incentive against "dis-investment". If people will know the tax is there they will have less an incentive to pull up business roots and move to Costa Rica, as people like Judy talk about. Also along these lines- - if a person has a choice of either stashing his profits in a Swiss account or going out and investing and hiring more workers - - will he be more likely to put his money in the bank with a higher - - or a lower tax rate. The higher tax is an incentive to invest in his business. And of course they said today that the rich pay 17% of their money in taxes while people in lower income brackets pay 24%. How is this fair? And I have already told you that a devalued dollar has only two drawbacks. If you are thinking of traveling to Paris this summer it will cost you more, and if you don't own gold already it will cost you more to buy it. Otherwise if anything a cheaper dollar has beneficial effects, such as helping our balance of trade. People like Dr. Levy don't want to believe this. And Jesus definitely taught against greed, miserlyness and suspicion. Should you see these things in your neighbor- - is it good to have more greediness in the world, or less? Answer me that. How is imitating and amplifying on the weakness of another a virtue. They say imitation is the best form of flattery, you know. Would you say that in general it's a good thing to pray for the success of your nation, or to pray for its failure, so you can alter the election results next year? Thom Hartman talked about awe and spirituality yesterday. If it in general a good thing to codify the inexplicable and the etherial into some sort of Hammarabi code that isn't changed for thousands of years but enforced at gunpoint on your enemies as you subdue them? And since did rape become such a good thing. In a thing I was watching today they said the obvious moral thing to do when a woman is raped by empregnation is to go on and raise the baby as her own. Don't you think one inailable right of a woman is to determine whom the father of her offspring will be? And also the thing is in error to say that rape is never dealt with by the death penalty. It certainly has been through the ages. This little segment kind of intoned that to love Nazism is to hate Christianity. How come Hitler's best friend was the Catholic Church? This little film kind of intoned that Nazism was somehow primarily a rebellion against Christianity. Tell me this- - who is it that prides them on strict laws against virtually Everything - - and it's the caprice of the government that determines whether the law will be enforced or not. If you say "Communist China" I would agree. But this was also the sentament intoned in this film. And just remember - - Jesus offered free medical care to everybody who asked. I am aware of no instance in the whole New Testament where Jesus refused to heal an individual. They talk about a God who would bleed and die for us. But then go out and defend multi millionaires who balk at paying a half percent more of their income to hire police, fire, and emergency workers. One of them told me last year "Our fiscle situation is so dire I'm not even going to vote for aids in law enforcement". Do you remember who complained about "government meddeling in private industry". Why, they will go so far as to "pick our pockets once a year" so employees can get Christmas off. That was Ebonezer Scruge, of course. And of course according to them the "right to contract with an employer" is in the Constitution. Actually I haven't seen that line. This is why these people defended child labor, because to abolish it would interfere with "a child's right to contract". Have you heard enough? Once people go down the road of moral rationalization they get farther and farther afield, till in the end they are taking the most extreme steps in defending what is no more than spiritual depravity. You remember what Peter Bailey said about Mr Potter. He said, "He's sick in his mind and he's sick in his soul". And that's where I'll leave it.

The Fundamental Phalicy of Limited Good: This is a pervasive belief among many. Clearly you see in in the people who "feel for" those poor rich people "who will get taxed by the government until they don't exist any more if this President gets his way". You've heard that one. Certain crises are shall we say "artificially generated". Such as sibblings fighting over who gets the biggest of pizza. They don't even think just to get more next time. You see it with a deliberate shortage of doctors, which is largely engineered by the AMA to keep their fees up. You see it in the resistence of the Republicans to solar energy, because energy from the Sun is free and it is a resource they can't corner the market on. You see it in the teachings of Jesus of KFI who essentially teaches "You can't have Good unless there is Evil to overcome". He makes good dependant on the existance of evil. You even see this teaching by George Burnes as God with his cute little "you can't have a top without a bottom" analogy. Also you see it in certain Bhudist teaching which one guy named Dr. Grouver explained was the delema of "If you have a limited ammount of fine wine do you dilute it for the masses, or do you treasure and save it and give it only out to people who climb the Hilalayas to seek you out on your Tibbitan mountain top? When put that way, limited good seems so pious. You see it in Gnosticism by implication teaching that God is so precious by nature than even God reproducing at all is in itself a sin on God's part because he must necessarily compromise his own nature. I refute this whole line of thinking in my own Prophecy book, of course in my karmic funnel analogy, courtessy Mark Campbell. In my model Evil is by nature finite, and good is by nature unlimited. However to refute the people who teach that "In God's sight we are all so similar because the difference between Adolph Eichman and Albert Sweitzer is infinetessable compared to the goodness of God. This teaching also is false. Good is an absolute level of moral perfection. It is not part of some "moral continuoum" like acids and bases or for that matter - - the political spectrim where people scramble to see who can position himself further to the political Right than his brother. Goodness is not some freakazoid extreme comodity where we wouldn't know it if we saw it. We all know good when we see it. It's an absurdity of people like Calvary Christians to teach that somehow goodness is so far out of reach- - like leaping off Huntington Beach pier and landing in one swoop in Catalina. God never in the Bible describes goodness like this. Evil on the other hand is both limited- - - but it IS an extreme. The moral here is that is you ARE at some "extreme" you are involved in some kind of Evil because Good is not extreme but Evil most certainly can be, and we see it in these right wing debaters and in the audience. But evil is also localized and limited. I hope people on our side find that reassuring. But there is no inherent shortage of good. Good is not something that "needs to be rationed" the way communist governments allocate government perks and resources. You can prove this easily. You say that God is infinite. You also say that God is good. If he is all infinite and all good, then how in the world can Good be limited? But the Neil Savedra KFI crowd balks at this line of reasoning because they don't want good to be as Solar energy, but rather they want to bottle it and ration it out and have control over it. The idea of "Peace breaking out" horrifies these people. Judy has said more than once to me "You can tell if what a Politician says is evil - - -if he preaches Peace". With an attitude like this what more can I say. These people NEED you to have problems. Just like they NEED abortion as an ongoing issue. They NEED you to not have a job or not be doing well in your business now. In other words, these people NEED evil. (Selah) If evil were to go away their whole reason for being would be gone. Neil Savedra trades on the name of a famous man because fundamentally he doesn't have faith in his own beliefs so he thinks if he can hide behind the beliefs and theology of others he is somehow "safe" from scruteny. Then these people can come back and threaten you if you should challenge them by saying 'My god is going to get you!" When you come right down to it, these people take the Lord's name in vain - - more pervasively than a drunken Austrailian sailor. If you doubt me- - maybe you will be afforded the "oppertunity" to "experiance" this all for yourself soon.

On a hopefully more cheery note we have the identify of that cosmic interventionist. One thing we can glean about him is that he's a Ringo file. Ringo is certainly identified with Romulans. Whether Ringo is another Beatle with the Sirius "O" gene is not positively determined. We don't want Ringo to fall into any jinxes. But I'll tell you a little secret- - - this jinx in question was not even a Pliades or Alcyonne jinx but a Sutteran jinx. Those are even more dangerous. (Sellah) I believe that people do have "hedges" or cosmic protection from certain evil forces that would do them in. I think people need to at times contemplate these things.

Well, the St Louis Cardinals live to fight another day. They say that at five different times in the game that St Louis trailed in runs, but came back. The game was tied up with a two run triple in the ninth buying them a whole tenth inning. They were down to their last strike trailing once again and they pulled it out. This is what you call perseverence, which is one of my seven cardinal traits, so to speak. "Never say die" is not only a hopeful attitude, but prudent, too. There is no percentage in listening to doubts which can only hinder you achieving your goal. I'm not postulating how the Cardinals will perform tonight, but one can have hope. They have "come back" many times this season. So - good luck St. Louis.

Finally we have one more mystery candidate. We have that "Dick Chaney" mystery. Did Dick appoint himself in this case? The mystery benefactor in the paragraph before last kind of hinted and intoned that indeed Dick Chaney did appoint himself. Let the reader understand what this means. This is an answer as to who was the "mystery John Lennon" during the psychidelic era and also the Rubber Soul, and the like, era. I'm still working on this one. When I get what I think is an answer, I'll let you know. Some people may wonder where Mark Campbell is now. Of course Mark Campbell's identity is about as secret as Steven Markato being Roman Kastivitz in Rosemary's Baby. He was the one who "identified" Mal Evans as a spirit entity around 1982. Mark and Mal have been close over the years but the word is that Mark has gone back to Andromeda, where he came from, and for whatever reason is no longer involved in Federation affairs.